Page 2 of 9

Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:04 pm
by marcelo_malara
Did anyone see this: Von Richthofen and Brown? I found it digging in allmovie.com.

Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:52 pm
by Karl Heidenreich
Nope. I imagine is a potrayal of how Brown shot down the Red Baron, which was not, because the Red Baron was shot by some aussies with AA fire.

Best regards...

Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 8:51 pm
by marcelo_malara
The allmovie review says the fighting scenes are good.

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 10:07 am
by RF
The fighting scenes have to be good to make the film a saleable commodity, after all it is in the business of entertainment. The problem is that historical accuracy is sacrificed for a ''good'' film.

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:53 pm
by George Roumbos
Hi all

"DAS BOOT"
"300"
"Blue Max"
"The Beast"

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 2:46 am
by dunmunro
In the air:

The Dam Busters

At Sea:

The Cruel Sea

Das Boot

On Ground:

War and Peace (The Soviet 8hr version) Nobody can top a battle scene filmed with over 100,000 extras and even a helicopter borne camera cannot see the whole battle field!

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:08 pm
by marcelo_malara
Hi all:

Somebody sent me this link: http://www.coastcomp.com/av/fltline2/avmovie.htm

It is a list of military aviation movies, with some details on the stuff used. Look for Battle of Britain, is really amazing.

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:35 pm
by José M. Rico
marcelo_malara wrote:Look for Battle of Britain, is really amazing.
The Heinkels He-111 used in the Battle of Britain film were Spanish built CASA 2111 of the Spanish Air Force.

I visited the Air Museum here in Madrid a few months ago and they had one of them on display as well as another veteran of the Spanish Civil War.

http://www.feelmadrid.com/photo176.html

http://www.feelmadrid.com/photo173.html

If I remember correctly there are also at least two Hispano HA 1112M-1L Buchon; the Spanish version of the Bf-109.

Museo del Aire, Madrid
http://www.feelmadrid.com/museodelaire.html

Best movie

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:09 pm
by redalb2253
Private Ryan is as close as it gets to real combat from what I've seen and from what WW2 vets who were there have said about it, U-577 for the depth charge scenes.

Re: Best movie

Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:58 pm
by Bgile
redalb2253 wrote:Private Ryan is as close as it gets to real combat from what I've seen and from what WW2 vets who were there have said about it, U-577 for the depth charge scenes.
I agree about "Saving Private Ryan", particularly the D-Day invasion part.

The Das Boot depth charge scenes were better, and U-577 was a terrible movie in general. A lot of it was ridiculous.

Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:17 pm
by Karl Heidenreich
I agree that the scenes of D-Day for Saving Private Ryan were good. But the best Spielberg´s combat can be seen in Band of Brothers Chapter 4: Replacements. It´s when Easy Company is about to occupy a town in Holand during Operation Market Garden and find it already occupied by Germans. The small unit combat there is, simple, superb and you can actually see how the infantry tactics are potrayed. Very good, much better than Saving Private Ryan.
About Das Boot is a very good movie, very depressing and we don´t actually see a sub combat (as you can see in The Enemy Below or the Bongo Strait).
U-whatever is just stupidity as can only be seen in a Hollywood contemporary movie (with Pearl Harbor in close competition).

Kind regards

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:07 pm
by redalb2253
My son called Pear harbour "Titanic with bombs". After he got through cussing the Japs (greatgrandad was there).

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:18 pm
by Karl Heidenreich
redalb2253:
My son called Pear harbour "Titanic with bombs".
Not being a Cameron fan myself I have to say that Titanic was far more superior, as a movie and historical document, than Pearl Harbor which is one of the greater trash film ever filmed...

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:24 pm
by marcelo_malara
Agreed, Titanic is flawless in its technical details, while in Pearl you have to suffer the Japanese carriers with theirs angled decks and the modern USN CG moored alongside the old ironsides...

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:07 am
by Karl Heidenreich
Marcelo:
Agreed, Titanic is flawless in its technical details, while in Pearl you have to suffer the Japanese carriers with theirs angled decks and the modern USN CG moored alongside the old ironsides...
100% right Marcelo. Pearl Harbor and U-57whatever are true trash.