Battleships firing forward?

Guns, torpedoes, mines, bombs, missiles, ammunition, fire control, radars, and electronic warfare.
User avatar
Rick Rather
Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 4:15 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Battleships firing forward?

Post by Rick Rather »

(DISCLAIMER: I am well-aware that Wikipedia is often inaccurate, and as such is most useful as a starting point for further research & learning, rather than an authoritative source.)

While reading Wikipedia's article about the turret explosion aboard USS Iowa, I came across this interesting - but inadequately-referenced - anecdote:
Iowa's new executive officer, Commander John Morse, directed a main battery drill, over the objections of his gun crews, in which Turrets One and Two fired while both were pointed 15° off the starboard side of the ship's bow. At this angle, one of Turret Two's guns was firing over Turret One... The concussion from Turret Two's guns shredded Turret One's gun bloomers (the canvas covers at the base of the main gun barrels) and damaged Turret One's electrical system. Dan Meyer said of the shoot that it was "the most frightening experience I have ever had in my life. The shock wave blew out the turret officer's switchboard and the leads. We had no power, no lights for a time. Men were screaming. There was panic."
I had always been given to understand that the firing arcs for the forward turrets on a battleship (unless blocked, e.g. the C-turret on Rodney & Nelson) could fire from the port quarter all the way around the bow to the starboard quarter. Were there restrictions on the B-turret firing arcs, so that they could only fire port & starboard but not forward?

(I ask this question mostly about BBs & BCs, since the overpressure from cruiser guns was not as great.)
Just because it's stupid, futile and doomed to failure, that doesn't mean some officer won't try it.
-- R. Rather
User avatar
tommy303
Senior Member
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:19 pm
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Battleships firing forward?

Post by tommy303 »

Bill Jurens might well be the person who could best answer your query.

Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
They stood and Earth's foundations stay;
What God abandoned these defended;
And saved the sum of things for pay.
MikeBrough
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:18 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Battleships firing forward?

Post by MikeBrough »

Burt says that HMS Neptune, the first British dreadnought with super-imposed turrets (X and Y), had stops in place to prevent X-turret firing directly over Y-turret. For the RN, it wasn't until HMS Hood that super-firing was possible.

I've read various personal accounts that suggest super-firing was no fun (in fact, any firing was no fun) but none to suggest it was out of bounds.
User avatar
tommy303
Senior Member
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:19 pm
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Battleships firing forward?

Post by tommy303 »

In the early dreadnoughts in which superfiring turrets were mounted, it was generally a bad idea to have the superfiring turret fire over the turret crown of the lower turret as the sighting ports, often in the gunhouse crowns, would allow the effects of blast into the gunhouse and make life for the crew very unpleasant. In the case of the Iowa, it might be that the super charges being used might have been more than the electronics of the turret could handle, particularly if they had not been upgraded since she was last in commission.

Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
They stood and Earth's foundations stay;
What God abandoned these defended;
And saved the sum of things for pay.
dunmunro
Senior Member
Posts: 4394
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:25 am
Location: Langley BC Canada

Re: Battleships firing forward?

Post by dunmunro »

Another factor is that RN BBs generally used salvo firing during daylight, so that 'B' turret would probably only fire one or two guns per salvo.

However, it is an interesting quote that reveals some of the limitations of BB fire at low elevations.
Byron Angel
Senior Member
Posts: 1655
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:06 am

Re: Battleships firing forward?

Post by Byron Angel »

Oscar Parkes writes at length in his book "British Battleships" about the practical arc of fire limits of the NELSON Class, stating that firing the main battery (particularly B turret) on any bearing aft of abeam was frowned upon and that firing 30deg aft of abeam made the bridge untenable.

The devil is always in the details .....

B
User avatar
Rick Rather
Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 4:15 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Battleships firing forward?

Post by Rick Rather »

Byron Angel wrote:Oscar Parkes writes at length in his book "British Battleships" about the practical arc of fire limits of the NELSON Class, stating that firing the main battery (particularly B turret) on any bearing aft of abeam was frowned upon and that firing 30deg aft of abeam made the bridge untenable.
That was my very next question. :wink:
Just because it's stupid, futile and doomed to failure, that doesn't mean some officer won't try it.
-- R. Rather
User avatar
tommy303
Senior Member
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:19 pm
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Battleships firing forward?

Post by tommy303 »

There appears, if memory serves, a similar injunction against firing the forward turrets of the Iowa's abaft the beam as well following the recommissioning of the ships with advanced electronics and cruise missile systems. It seems the tremendous blast of the forward guns was capable of damaging the more sensitive systems. The blast pressure of battleship guns was enormous and full capable of causing minor damage to the ship firing them as witnessed by numerous post action reports. Rodney, for instance, suffered more damage from her own guns than she did from near misses from Bismarck.

Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
They stood and Earth's foundations stay;
What God abandoned these defended;
And saved the sum of things for pay.
Post Reply