Bismarck with Triple Turrets...

Historical what if discussions, hypothetical operations, battleship vs. battleship engagements, design your own warship, etc.
Gerard Heimann
Supporter
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:30 pm
Location: Bay Shore, NY, USA

Re: Bismarck with Triple Turrets...

Post by Gerard Heimann »

Tommy, was there much navigation room in the Kiel Canal to accommodate more beam?

Silverton
User avatar
José M. Rico
Administrator
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:23 am
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: Bismarck with Triple Turrets...

Post by José M. Rico »

Gerard Heimann wrote:Tommy, was there much navigation room in the Kiel Canal to accommodate more beam?

Silverton
I think the problem had more to do with the depth of the Canal and not with its width.
The locks at Brunsbüttel and Kiel-Holtenau were 45 meters wide.
Gerard Heimann
Supporter
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:30 pm
Location: Bay Shore, NY, USA

Re: Bismarck with Triple Turrets...

Post by Gerard Heimann »

Jose, thanks but I think that Tommy's point was that a wider beam would allow greater weight without adding more draft. I wondered whether the canal could accommodate the extra width. 45 meters wide would seem to be plenty.

Regards,
Gerard
User avatar
tommy303
Senior Member
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:19 pm
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Re: Bismarck with Triple Turrets...

Post by tommy303 »

The H-class were to have a beam of 37m, so there was adequate clearance in the locks which have a usable width of 42m. Presumably, as the bottom of the canal narrows to about 44m in places from its nominal 90m, traffic would have had to be controlled so as to give a big ship like the H-class or Bismarck a wide safety margin--ie when a ship of those sizes was in transit, traffic was probably one way.

Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
They stood and Earth's foundations stay;
What God abandoned these defended;
And saved the sum of things for pay.
Post Reply