RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
I remember reading in a book (forgotten its name and author because it was a long time ago) that at Samar Yamato got a stradle on one of the US escort carriers at a range of over 30,000m, but I can't find much further on this. Perhaps someone here can confirm or disprove it.
- Dave Saxton
- Supporter
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Rocky Mountains USA
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
I have ran across a few more recent accounts, citing Kurita's reports, that the Yamato opened fire at 31,000 meters (33,900 yards). Some of these accounts are quite interesting as they differ from the usual accounts in some details concerning the Yamato's shooting.
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.
- Karl Heidenreich
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4808
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:19 pm
- Location: San José, Costa Rica
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
David89:
Dave Saxton:
It will be good to confirm it. For sure it could vanish some mis handed concepts around here.I remember reading in a book (forgotten its name and author because it was a long time ago) that at Samar Yamato got a stradle on one of the US escort carriers at a range of over 30,000m, but I can't find much further on this. Perhaps someone here can confirm or disprove it.
I remember reading in a book (forgotten its name and author because it was a long time ago) that at Samar Yamato got a stradle on one of the US escort carriers at a range of over 30,000m, but I can't find much further on this. Perhaps someone here can confirm or disprove it.
Dave Saxton:
Differ in which way? It would be interesting to add new information to this.I have ran across a few more recent accounts, citing Kurita's reports, that the Yamato opened fire at 31,000 meters (33,900 yards). Some of these accounts are quite interesting as they differ from the usual accounts in some details concerning the Yamato's shooting.
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.
Sir Winston Churchill
Sir Winston Churchill
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
Some don't give her any credit for coming close to a US ship. Others give her credit for at least one or more hits. With others between.
- Karl Heidenreich
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4808
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:19 pm
- Location: San José, Costa Rica
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
lwd:
Best regards.
But it´s important not to let this die or stop here. If this same situation would be about an Iowa then we will be reading a complete thread on how she hit a Japanese tug with her anchor while her crew was looking for geishas in Okinawa, being the hit proof of how remarkably well the RDFC works. Let´s research to know what really happened. I have Wilmott´s "Leyte Gulf" but don´t have read it still because I´m still trying to read Friedman´s. This next weekend I´ll try to search about the action.Some don't give her any credit for coming close to a US ship. Others give her credit for at least one or more hits. With others between.
Best regards.
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.
Sir Winston Churchill
Sir Winston Churchill
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
She may have hit two US ships.Some don't give her any credit for coming close to a US ship.
- Dave Saxton
- Supporter
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Rocky Mountains USA
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
Not having the accounts handy, I'm hesitant to provide more on line, because working from memory I might misquote them, but more importantly I can't examine more closely their sources. These differing veiws in the details could have profound implications, and are bound to be controversial.Karl Heidenreich wrote: Differ in which way? It would be interesting to add new information to this.
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
Thats is bloody funny Karl!!! Im crying.But it´s important not to let this die or stop here. If this same situation would be about an Iowa then we will be reading a complete thread on how she hit a Japanese tug with her anchor while her crew was looking for geishas in Okinawa, being the hit proof of how remarkably well the RDFC works.
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
Jaluz Skulki (Spelling????) Anantomy of Ship says something along those lines. Also claiming she sank a destroyer and a CVE for 102 18.1" rounds fired or something.
In relation to Karl's post, Ive also heard Iowa's RDFC could actually teleport rounds directly into an enemy magazine.. destroying the enemy ship with one shot. True, its in her TROM.
In relation to Karl's post, Ive also heard Iowa's RDFC could actually teleport rounds directly into an enemy magazine.. destroying the enemy ship with one shot. True, its in her TROM.
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
I agree. Unfortunatly we'll probably never have definitive information. I suspect that reality as usual lies somewhere in the middle. It would be nice to at least narrow the range a bit though.Karl Heidenreich wrote:lwd:
But it´s important not to let this die or stop here.Some don't give her any credit for coming close to a US ship. Others give her credit for at least one or more hits. With others between.
Funny.... not particularly accurate or pertinant but funny.If this same situation would be about an Iowa then we will be reading a complete thread on how she hit a Japanese tug with her anchor while her crew was looking for geishas in Okinawa, being the hit proof of how remarkably well the RDFC works....
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
Was curious about this so ran some calculations:Dave Saxton wrote:I have ran across a few more recent accounts, citing Kurita's reports, that the Yamato opened fire at 31,000 meters (33,900 yards)...
From: http://www.j-aircraft.org/smf/index.php?topic=6322.0
Plugging 127 feet as the height of Yamato's range finder her horizon would have been ~26,000 yards according to:
http://www.boatsafe.com/tools/horizon.htm
Plugging 12' in we get a horizon of ~8,000 yards or a sum of ~34,000 yards. So the first 12 feet of the US ships hulls would have been below the horizon. Certainly enough of the CVE's above the horizon to see given good visibility. On the other hand I've seen reports that the Japanese misjudged the range due misjudging the size of their opponents (this has always seamed a bit questionable to me). There's also the possiblity that they opened fire when the CVE's were that far away but fired initally vs the closer DE's and DD's. Will try to check some referances and see what more I can find.
So far not much definitive. Most sources do seam to agree that the Japanese opened fire at around 30,000 yards and were getting stradles fairly soon.
Last edited by lwd on Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
Personally I don't doubt such shooting is possible, just that it would require very good visibility. Shooting at a hull down target isn't in itself a big problem with heavy gun shell splashes.
-
- Member
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Tavistock, West Devon
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
A question here chaps, obviously any penetration is going to do damage, but what of the upperworks, i.e. range finders, fire control, radar even the bridge itself, if some of these are hit and seriously damaged the ship surely looses her capacity to fight back efectively. I know there are back up systems, but until the are put into action the ship (either Yamoto or Iowa) could be taking a lot more punishment, after all the Bismarck suffered a major hit from Rodney and in the Counts words "that was the end of the fighting instuments" - just how vunerable were these items to heavy shells?marcelo_malara wrote:Hi Bgile:
I took the hit probablilty from navweaps.com. I used two legs, one for the 35.000-40.000 yard interval (in which the deck CAN be penetrated) and the other for the 35.000-25.000 yards interval (in which the deck CAN NOT be penetrated). For the first leg the probability for Iowa, firing continuosly, of hitting a Bismarck size target is 1.5 times. So I figure that all the money goes in that hit, because at less range the vitals would not be penetrated and below 25.000 yards Yamato will open fire, so Iowa can be damaged too. The "inmunity" of Iowa is for Yamato to stay outside the 35.000 yards circle, assuming that Yamato would not hit at that distance (which is also an asumption).
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
Most fire control positions, ie., directors and rangefinders, were extremely vulnerable to main armament hits from a battleship (or even heavy cruiser for that matter), as the amount of armour which could be devoted to them was relatively small for reasons of stability.
Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
They stood and Earth's foundations stay;
What God abandoned these defended;
And saved the sum of things for pay.
- Dave Saxton
- Supporter
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Rocky Mountains USA
Re: RFC equipped Yamato vs. Iowa
The likleyhood of such hits occuring has proven to be likely as well. These locations are neccesarily extremities sticking up, and are likely to get whacked sooner or later. Besides Scharnhorst and Bismarck, I can think of at least three other occurances off the top of my head, including South Dakota. BB57 had lost all but one radar set, and all communication radio areils.
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.