torpedoes

Warship design and construction, terminology, navigation, hydrodynamics, stability, armor schemes, damage control, etc.
paul.mercer
Senior Member
Posts: 1229
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:25 pm

torpedoes

Post by paul.mercer »

Gentlemen,
This may seem a bit of a daft question given the age of missiles, but do any warships today still carry torpedoes?
OpanaPointer
Senior Member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:00 pm

Re: torpedoes

Post by OpanaPointer »

A triple tube mount doesn't take up much space and it's another string in the bow.
Steve Crandell
Senior Member
Posts: 954
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:05 pm

Re: torpedoes

Post by Steve Crandell »

paul.mercer wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 9:08 am Gentlemen,
This may seem a bit of a daft question given the age of missiles, but do any warships today still carry torpedoes?
Yes. Submarines, obviously. Destroyers carry ASW torpedoes for their helos, and It doesn't cost much in weight or money to install torpedo tubes near the helicopter magazine. Also, some ASW missiles have a lightweight torpedo as their payload.
User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Re: torpedoes

Post by marcelo_malara »

I have ever wander about this. Why the surface torpedo disappeared? Nowadays it is clear that missiles are faster, but back in the 60s there were almost no anti ship missiles aboard, while the torpedo had already evolved to the guided monopropellant powered device that gave them about 50 km range with unheard off accuracy.
Steve Crandell
Senior Member
Posts: 954
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:05 pm

Re: torpedoes

Post by Steve Crandell »

I think the CV had become the chief offensive weapon system, and getting within 50 km of a CV would be a difficult proposition unless you are in a submarine.
User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Re: torpedoes

Post by marcelo_malara »

Yes, but not every navy had a CV, so you can say that there was a need for the the torpedo yet.

Regards
OpanaPointer
Senior Member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:00 pm

Re: torpedoes

Post by OpanaPointer »

Steve Crandell
Senior Member
Posts: 954
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:05 pm

Re: torpedoes

Post by Steve Crandell »

marcelo_malara wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2020 10:59 pm Yes, but not every navy had a CV, so you can say that there was a need for the the torpedo yet.

Regards
Which is why the Soviet Union pioneered the development of anti-ship missiles. Of course, they also had a very large number of submarines.
User avatar
wadinga
Senior Member
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:49 pm
Location: Tonbridge England

Re: torpedoes

Post by wadinga »

Fellow Contributors,

Searching for a control mechanism to allow:
while the torpedo had already evolved to the guided monopropellant powered device that gave them about 50 km range with unheard off accuracy.
I came across the Hedy Lamarr and George Antheil 1941 patent for frequency hopping to be applied to radio control of torpedoes. Correct me if I'm wrong but radio waves don't really work underwater apart from Ultra Low Frequency for low bandwidth communications, for which you need a very long aerial (underwater aerial :shock: )

Frequency hopping is applied to missile control to try to avoid jamming, and to other kinds of communications, but radio controlled torpedoes must have been a dead end. What aside from acoustic homing gives any kind of "accuracy" at 50 km range?

RN Spearfish can apparently do 80 knots for shorter ranges and spooled wire control gets into into the target vicinity before passive acoustic homing. However we are in the area where manufacturer claims and deliberate misinformation cloud the picture. RN Tigerfish had very low reliability in service.

All the best

wadinga
"There seems to be something wrong with our bloody ships today!"
User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Re: torpedoes

Post by marcelo_malara »

Well, long range torpedoes use mid course guidance thru a cable, receiving target data from the parent platform, the torpedo onboard sensors have not the space for the sensitivity needed for a 50 km detection.

I must say that I am in a mistake with this, the wonder-propellants were not available until the 60s, unless in the USN. The USN experimented with NAVOL (hydrogen peroxide) till 1952, then went to electric propulsion for all their torpedoes, until the Mk46 ASW of 1968. A 50 km guided torpedo does not seem possible in the time frame before antiship missiles came into existence in numbers.
User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Re: torpedoes

Post by marcelo_malara »

About radio guidance for torpedoes, yes, there is no way for this unless you deploy an aerial above surface. Anyway, here in Argentina somebody tried exactly this, radio guidance and (stranger yet) explosion engine propulsion, air admitted via a kind of snorkel, will look for pictures. It had a large warhead, the intention was to attack a landing force while on the final approach to the beach.

Regards
User avatar
marcelo_malara
Senior Member
Posts: 2012
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: buenos aires

Re: torpedoes

Post by marcelo_malara »

Here is the article of the Argentine project, it was developed by an Italian engineer that had made something similar during the war. Sorry it is in Spanish, but there are some pictures so you can get an idea of the device, the engine would be an DB605.


https://issuu.com/archivohistorico/docs ... archivo_33
OpanaPointer
Senior Member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:00 pm

Re: torpedoes

Post by OpanaPointer »

marcelo_malara wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2020 7:45 pm About radio guidance for torpedoes, yes, there is no way for this unless you deploy an aerial above surface. Anyway, here in Argentina somebody tried exactly this, radio guidance and (stranger yet) explosion engine propulsion, air admitted via a kind of snorkel, will look for pictures. It had a large warhead, the intention was to attack a landing force while on the final approach to the beach.

Regards
Torpedoes have had some really weird guidance systems.

Image
Post Reply