US Gato class submarines

Warship design and construction, terminology, navigation, hydrodynamics, stability, armor schemes, damage control, etc.
User avatar
RF
Senior Member
Posts: 7760
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: Wolverhampton, ENGLAND

US Gato class submarines

Post by RF »

Would this class be counted as amongst the best long range attack conventional submarines of WW2, superior to what the Kriegsmarine had (I am here ignoring the Electro-boots on the grounds they were not conventional and not actually used on any significant scale.)
''Give me a Ping and one Ping only'' - Sean Connery.
Tiornu
Supporter
Posts: 1222
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:13 am
Location: Ex Utero

Re: US Gato class submarines

Post by Tiornu »

The Gato/Balao/Tench type was certainly the most successful. They fought a different type of war then the U-boats and are not as immediately comparable as some might like. Perhaps the Type IX is most similar.
dunmunro
Senior Member
Posts: 4394
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:25 am
Location: Langley BC Canada

Post by dunmunro »

I've always been a fan of the RN T class, as they had a very effective combination of range and firepower, although they don't look that great on paper.
Bgile
Senior Member
Posts: 3658
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 7:33 pm
Location: Portland, OR, USA

Post by Bgile »

I think the Gatos were the ultimate in the concept of a surface combatant which can submerge. I don't intend that to be a degrogatory comment at all. They had high surface speed, powerful surface armament, lots of torpedoes, and the very long cruising range required for independent operations in the Pacific. Ultimately they carried and used air and surface search radar. Some of them even carried two deck guns and had centralized fire control for them. They were extrememly effective at what they were designed to do, and they destroyed the Japanese merchant marine.

On the other hand, the German boats were better submarines in the purest sense of the word. They were ultimately designed to operate submerged indefinitely. They were technically superior.

The two types were designed to operate in completely different environments, and their differences reflected that.
Post Reply