GHG and the related warnings
Moderator: Bill Jurens
- Antonio Bonomi
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3799
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 am
- Location: Vimercate ( Milano ) - Italy
GHG and the related warnings
Hello everybody,
the Gruppen Horch Gerät ( GHG ) installed on both Prinz Eugen and Bismarck had a very critical role.
It helped the enemy interception as well as it caused some alarms.
A Prinz Eugen survivor I interviewed time ago told me that it was a key equipment they were utilizing during the Op. Rheinubung.
What is your opinion about it and it's role during the various operation events.
Bye Antonio
the Gruppen Horch Gerät ( GHG ) installed on both Prinz Eugen and Bismarck had a very critical role.
It helped the enemy interception as well as it caused some alarms.
A Prinz Eugen survivor I interviewed time ago told me that it was a key equipment they were utilizing during the Op. Rheinubung.
What is your opinion about it and it's role during the various operation events.
Bye Antonio
In order to honor a soldier, we have to tell the truth about what happened over there. The whole, hard, cold truth. And until we do that, we dishonor her and every soldier who died, who gave their life for their country. ( Courage Under Fire )
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Bucharest, Romania
Re: GHG and the related warnings
For me, the key element brough by the GHG during the main battle phase was the detection of "2 more enemy vessels" [Hood and Prince of Wales], at 5:35 or so, implying that range TO Hood and Prince of Wales at that moment was ~ 30km or so. [the Prinz eugen log also tells us that the battleship detection range was about 30km]Antonio Bonomi wrote:Hello everybody,
the Gruppen Horch Gerät ( GHG ) installed on both Prinz Eugen and Bismarck had a very critical role.
It helped the enemy interception as well as it caused some alarms.
A Prinz Eugen survivor I interviewed time ago told me that it was a key equipment they were utilizing during the Op. Rheinubung.
What is your opinion about it and it's role during the various operation events.
Bye Antonio
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 954
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:05 pm
Re: GHG and the related warnings
The sonar from the Prinz Eugene was installed on a US submarine post war. It was studied and formed the basis for one of several sonars installed on US submarines. We called it the "conformal array". It had a large number of transducers wrapped around the bow and a short distance down the sides of the submarine. This sonar was called the BQR-1. I served on US submarines for nine years, in the late sixties and early seventies. By that time it had been considerably refined with advanced transducers and electronic signal processing, and it was called the BQR-7.
I was not a sonar operator, but spent a fair amount of time in the sonar room and a lot of time in the control room while tracking various contacts. The conformal array was used when we were looking for a very faint contact, possibly at very long range. It was not the preferred sonar when tracking something at medium to close range for a fire control solution. Because of the possibility of a very long range contact, it could take quite a while to determine how close it was and whether it was worth prosecuting. Like all sonars, it worked best on a very quiet platform moving at low speed.
Was Prinz Eugene very quiet? Obviously not. She would have had a large amount of self noise as well as a large amount of flow noise when travelling at high speed. Of course, a large target surface ship travelling at high speed is also very noisy and she could and did track them.
With respect to the torpedo report at DS ... have you ever been under water listening to a ski boat? That is similar to what a torpedo sounds like. In my opinion, that same sort of sound could be caused by equipment on one of the British ships; possibly even a "runaway" motor of some kind on Hood, sinking into the depths. Could it have been one of Hood's torpedoes started by the shock of her death throes? Who knows?
Currently large USN ships like carriers do not carry sonars. They did at one time, but it just isn't considered worth it today.
I was not a sonar operator, but spent a fair amount of time in the sonar room and a lot of time in the control room while tracking various contacts. The conformal array was used when we were looking for a very faint contact, possibly at very long range. It was not the preferred sonar when tracking something at medium to close range for a fire control solution. Because of the possibility of a very long range contact, it could take quite a while to determine how close it was and whether it was worth prosecuting. Like all sonars, it worked best on a very quiet platform moving at low speed.
Was Prinz Eugene very quiet? Obviously not. She would have had a large amount of self noise as well as a large amount of flow noise when travelling at high speed. Of course, a large target surface ship travelling at high speed is also very noisy and she could and did track them.
With respect to the torpedo report at DS ... have you ever been under water listening to a ski boat? That is similar to what a torpedo sounds like. In my opinion, that same sort of sound could be caused by equipment on one of the British ships; possibly even a "runaway" motor of some kind on Hood, sinking into the depths. Could it have been one of Hood's torpedoes started by the shock of her death throes? Who knows?
Currently large USN ships like carriers do not carry sonars. They did at one time, but it just isn't considered worth it today.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Bucharest, Romania
Re: GHG and the related warnings
I would like to ask what does "flow noise" mean ? Is it the water rushing sideways and under the ship ?
- Antonio Bonomi
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3799
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 am
- Location: Vimercate ( Milano ) - Italy
Re: GHG and the related warnings
Hello everybody,
on the Baron book he wrote that just after 05.00 that morning the Prinz Eugen hydrophones picked up noise on the port ( left ) side of the German formation.
Than Group North at 05.09 informed them that the Suffolk was again radio communicating their position ....
Now my question to you is very simple.
Do you think that it was because of that warning that Adm Lutjens ordered this manoeuvre of the German formation from 220° to 170° and back to 220 ° again ?
Opinions welcome ...
Bye Antonio
on the Baron book he wrote that just after 05.00 that morning the Prinz Eugen hydrophones picked up noise on the port ( left ) side of the German formation.
Than Group North at 05.09 informed them that the Suffolk was again radio communicating their position ....
Now my question to you is very simple.
Do you think that it was because of that warning that Adm Lutjens ordered this manoeuvre of the German formation from 220° to 170° and back to 220 ° again ?
Opinions welcome ...
Bye Antonio
In order to honor a soldier, we have to tell the truth about what happened over there. The whole, hard, cold truth. And until we do that, we dishonor her and every soldier who died, who gave their life for their country. ( Courage Under Fire )
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 954
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:05 pm
Re: GHG and the related warnings
Yes. It interferes with the efficiency of the transducers. Any imperfections or protrusions can also cause cavitation, which is a noise source. Part of preparation to submerge after leaving port involves folding all cleats and other topside protrusions under so the hull becomes as smooth as possible and water can flow around it with as little irregularity as possible.alecsandros wrote:
I would like to ask what does "flow noise" mean ? Is it the water rushing sideways and under the ship ?
Of course a large ship with screws designed for high speed and efficiency (not silence) cavitates a great deal and causes noise that can be heard from a great distance. Modern submarine screws are designed as a compromise between propulsive efficiency and the reduction of cavitation. Also, the deeper you go the faster the screws can turn without cavitating.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Bucharest, Romania
Re: GHG and the related warnings
... Is it certain it was Prince of Wales and Hood ?Antonio Bonomi wrote:
on the Baron book he wrote that just after 05.00 that morning the Prinz Eugen hydrophones picked up noise on the port ( left ) side of the German formation.
Because we know the limitations of the GHG, and tracking them at 05:00 would imply a range of ~ 30km. This begs the question of why didn't the 2 forces interact much, much sooner then 05:52.
ALso, Prinz Eugen's log mentions a detection of 2 new contacts at around 5:30, not 05:00...
- paulcadogan
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:03 am
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Re: GHG and the related warnings
Hmmm... Prinz Eugen's KTB is very confusing:alecsandros wrote:ALso, Prinz Eugen's log mentions a detection of 2 new contacts at around 5:30, not 05:00...
Brinkmann notes this in sequence:
At 0407, noises were heard by the GHG bearing 286 degrees. (If that is "true" that would be on the starboard bow if the ship was on 220 which makes no sense). Then at 0425 the GHG reported torpedo noises bearing 195 degrees (just fwd of the port beam) which were attributed by Brinkmann to a mistaken bearing caused by the ships to port. THEN almost an hour later at 0521 the two ships turn to port to 170.
(Note - this can't be a mix up of time conversion since the 0425 entry comes ahead of the 0521. So 0425 is not really 0525. )
Schmalenbach reports something completely different:
At estimated 0425 (which has 0525 GMT in brackets) the listening room reported propeller noises bearing 242 or 252 degrees, specifying two targets and after a few minutes smoke was seen from the foretop in that direction and all this was duly reported to Brinkmann.
So Brinkmann writes torpedo noises at 0425 (0525??), Schmalenbach specifies propeller noises from two contacts at about 0525, then smoke.
But at 0525, if that time is accurate, the ships are already on course 170.
What gives??
Qui invidet minor est - He who envies is the lesser man
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Bucharest, Romania
Re: GHG and the related warnings
... But Brinkmann doesn't say (perhaps he didn't know) wether the noises at 4:07 were new or not. Maybe they were made by Norfolk, Suffolk or both, or none of them, but other ships in the vicinity, or was simply a false echo.paulcadogan wrote: At 0407, noises were heard by the GHG bearing 286 degrees. (If that is "true" that would be on the starboard bow if the ship was on 220 which makes no sense). Then at 0425 the GHG reported torpedo noises bearing 195 degrees (just fwd of the port beam) which were attributed by Brinkmann to a mistaken bearing caused by the ships to port. THEN almost an hour later at 0521 the two ships turn to port to 170.
Torpedo noises were reported by the GHG on at least 3 separate occasions, all on May 24th. And all of them proved to be unfounded...
The turn to 170 could be a result of the existing ice masses floating around the ships in the strait...
- Dave Saxton
- Supporter
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Rocky Mountains USA
Re: GHG and the related warnings
Relative bearings might work better. 286* relative would be just ahead the port beam instead of off the starboard bow..ect...paulcadogan wrote: Hmmm... Prinz Eugen's KTB is very confusing:
Brinkmann notes this in sequence:
At 0407, noises were heard by the GHG bearing 286 degrees. (If that is "true" that would be on the starboard bow if the ship was on 220 which makes no sense). Then at 0425 the GHG reported torpedo noises bearing 195 degrees (just fwd of the port beam) which were attributed by Brinkmann to a mistaken bearing caused by the ships to port. THEN almost an hour later at 0521 the two ships turn to port to 170.
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.
- Dave Saxton
- Supporter
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Rocky Mountains USA
Re: GHG and the related warnings
In Unter Drie Flaggen, Schmalenbach quotes his own watch officer's record: that the 286* GHG contact was at 0440 hours (PG time), which is 0540 hours by our reckoning. 286* relative would have been Hood and Prince of Wales, and 0540 hours would have put them about 31 km away. And that makes sense.paulcadogan wrote: Schmalenbach reports something completely different:
At estimated 0425 (which has 0525 GMT in brackets) the listening room reported propeller noises bearing 242 or 252 degrees, specifying two targets and after a few minutes smoke was seen from the foretop in that direction and all this was duly reported to Brinkmann.
What time was the false torpedo report during the battle?
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.
- paulcadogan
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:03 am
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Re: GHG and the related warnings
But then 195 deg at 0525 while on course 170 wound be astern to port- i.e. to the north!Dave Saxton wrote:Relative bearings might work better. 286* relative would be just ahead the port beam instead of off the starboard bow..ect...
Makes sense yes, but throws some more conflicting data into the mix! Was there another Brinkmann "boo boo" then??Dave Saxton wrote:In Unter Drie Flaggen, Schmalenbach quotes his own watch officer's record: that the 286* GHG contact was at 0440 hours (PG time), which is 0540 hours by our reckoning. 286* relative would have been Hood and Prince of Wales, and 0540 hours would have put them about 31 km away. And that makes sense.
The false torpedo alarm was at about 0603 during the battle. The GHG probably picked up the noises generated by the sinking Hood. An upward rush of air bubbles would have been streaming out of the hull as it plunged to the depths. Probably sounded like nearby torpedoes would - the direction was right too. The power of suggestion then made Brinkmann and others see what they expected to see...
Qui invidet minor est - He who envies is the lesser man
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: Bucharest, Romania
Re: GHG and the related warnings
... Possibly, but let's not forget the GHG provided false torpedo data on several more situations during the day, so the equipment was either to new , and the crew to inexperienced to properly use it, or it imply provided inaccurate data from time to time.paulcadogan wrote:
The false torpedo alarm was at about 0603 during the battle. The GHG probably picked up the noises generated by the sinking Hood. An upward rush of air bubbles would have been streaming out of the hull as it plunged to the depths. Probably sounded like nearby torpedoes would - the direction was right too. The power of suggestion then made Brinkmann and others see what they expected to see...
- Dave Saxton
- Supporter
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:02 pm
- Location: Rocky Mountains USA
Re: GHG and the related warnings
The ship's KTB is for the most part typed up by clerks as it is compiled by the ships command after the fact. It is a mistake if we take it as exclusively a running record in chronological order as it happened. The watch officer's personal log is primary to the main KTB and should be given more weight.paulcadogan wrote:Makes sense yes, but throws some more conflicting data into the mix! Was there another Brinkmann "boo boo" then??Dave Saxton wrote:In Unter Drie Flaggen, Schmalenbach quotes his own watch officer's record: that the 286* GHG contact was at 0440 hours (PG time), which is 0540 hours by our reckoning. 286* relative would have been Hood and Prince of Wales, and 0540 hours would have put them about 31 km away. And that makes sense.
...
Entering a night sea battle is an awesome business.The enveloping darkness, hiding the enemy's.. seems a living thing, malignant and oppressive.Swishing water at the bow and stern mark an inexorable advance toward an unknown destiny.
- Antonio Bonomi
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3799
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:44 am
- Location: Vimercate ( Milano ) - Italy
Re: GHG and the related warnings
Hello everybody,
those may be of some help understanding ...
The GHG bearings while on course 220° :
The GHG bearings while on course 170° :
Bye Antonio
those may be of some help understanding ...
The GHG bearings while on course 220° :
The GHG bearings while on course 170° :
Bye Antonio
In order to honor a soldier, we have to tell the truth about what happened over there. The whole, hard, cold truth. And until we do that, we dishonor her and every soldier who died, who gave their life for their country. ( Courage Under Fire )