paul.mercer wrote:
I agree, but the subject was on the use of searchlights, not on the range which, as you say was point blank.
Strange
I was responding to your specific post
.
Moderator: Bill Jurens
paul.mercer wrote:
I agree, but the subject was on the use of searchlights, not on the range which, as you say was point blank.
We appear to be at cross purposes, apologies for the confusionphil gollin wrote:paul.mercer wrote:
I agree, but the subject was on the use of searchlights, not on the range which, as you say was point blank.
Strange
I was responding to your specific post
.