Search found 382 matches
- Fri Feb 14, 2020 11:37 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
- Replies: 343
- Views: 70865
Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Hans, ( Very politely) Those comments are NOT "polemics", they are perfectly logical statements/questions. The whole point of others' arguments is that the available evidence is insufficient/incomplete to support any claim that the map/reconstruction is "consistent - and no one can cl...
- Mon Feb 10, 2020 11:54 am
- Forum: Naval Technology
- Topic: Logistics Question Tanker Refueling
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7390
Re: Logistics Question Tanker Refueling
. In the Atlantic, the Escort Oiler Force was established in 1943 to ensure that escorts were not restricted in running down contacts, or high speed running. From late 1943 there was at least one, and normally two oilers in each convoy. In addition, Escort Carriers could refuel escorts. The oilers u...
- Fri Jan 31, 2020 11:53 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
- Replies: 343
- Views: 70865
Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
......... We can agree to disagree that a definitive reconstruction is possible: for me Mr. Bonomi map is a good enough reconstruction, that explains what happened and matches all available information, valid if no alternative and better construct can be build. ...... [/color][/i] . That is the sam...
- Tue Jan 21, 2020 12:37 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
- Replies: 343
- Views: 70865
Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
.
Re. "history is written by the winners"
In this instance who were/are "the winners" ?
At the Denmark Strait, the Germans were the "winners", overall the British/Allies were the "winners".
.
Re. "history is written by the winners"
In this instance who were/are "the winners" ?
At the Denmark Strait, the Germans were the "winners", overall the British/Allies were the "winners".
.
- Tue Dec 10, 2019 10:28 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
- Replies: 343
- Views: 70865
Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
...... I think quite many people (especially officers) had their own camera on board during WWII (my father had one in 1943) even without a formal authorization. ....... [/color][/i] The RN had an official ban on private cameras for almost all the war, AND in addition the importation of photographi...
- Fri Nov 08, 2019 12:20 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Electricity usage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1112
Re: Electricity usage
In the WW2 era, all steam powered (propelled) warships would have produced their electricity from turbo-generators (i.e. steam powered). They would have batteries and diesel powered generators for emergencies. Obviously for diesel powered ships and all submarines then they would diesel electric gene...
- Sun Oct 27, 2019 11:37 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: The Bismarck surrender option
- Replies: 96
- Views: 17762
Re: The Bismarck surrender option
.
When someone is tried in Italy are they charged under the Ten Commandments, or under the relevant law(s) ?
Until you get that straight you are misleading yourself.
.
When someone is tried in Italy are they charged under the Ten Commandments, or under the relevant law(s) ?
Until you get that straight you are misleading yourself.
.
- Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:11 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: The Bismarck surrender option
- Replies: 96
- Views: 17762
Re: The Bismarck surrender option
.
You keep trying to avoid the King's Regulations and going off on a tangent, deliberately trying to mislead people.
.
You keep trying to avoid the King's Regulations and going off on a tangent, deliberately trying to mislead people.
.
- Fri Oct 25, 2019 1:35 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: The Bismarck surrender option
- Replies: 96
- Views: 17762
Re: The Bismarck surrender option
Alberto Virtuani wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2019 1:09 pm
...... the Kings Regulations (art.26 ,1913 version) say :
The 1913 version was NOT the one in force in 1941 [editorial commentary deleted WJJ] .
.
- Thu Oct 24, 2019 10:40 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: The Bismarck surrender option
- Replies: 96
- Views: 17762
Re: The Bismarck surrender option
Wadinga wrote: "The Articles of warres (as originally spelt) of 1637 are irrelevant to discussion of Kriegsmarine ships in the twentieth century." No, sorry, they are extremely relevant for the British ships, as we are discussing British examples too. They are the military rules in force ...
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 10:29 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: bismark-after torpedo hit
- Replies: 208
- Views: 39507
Re: bismark-after torpedo hit
. The first RN magnetic pistol - Duplex Coil Rod (DCR) - (as used in the first Ark Royal attack on Bismarck) had very poor reliability and was too sensitive. The second version - Compensated Coil Rod (CCR) - part operational in late 1942, fully operational from early 1943 was much more efficient and...
- Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:30 pm
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: Questions on how British submarines returned to base safely
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1995
Re: Questions on how British submarines returned to base safely
. Exact details are hard to come by, but close to shore (under the intense air patrolling) then they would be given a sort of moving square in which they should travel, they would meet a ML, or similar, near any base/port who would escort them. IF there was a problem (e.g. engine problems) the sub w...
- Wed Sep 25, 2019 10:21 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: The Court Martial for the Denmark Strait
- Replies: 2260
- Views: 227447
Re: The Court Martial for the Denmark Strait
.
DON'T FEED THE TROLL
.
DON'T FEED THE TROLL
.
- Wed Aug 21, 2019 10:16 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Battleship Bismarck: A Design and Operational History
- Replies: 59
- Views: 23025
Re: Battleship Bismarck: A Design and Operational History
.
Alberto,
PLEASE, very politely, please do not try to start another argument here.
.
Alberto,
PLEASE, very politely, please do not try to start another argument here.
.
- Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:19 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: 3-shaft propulsion
- Replies: 132
- Views: 183971
Re: 3-shaft propulsion
. One has to be careful with speed and range quotes as they depend on the state of the hull (fouling). Trials info TENDED to be with reasonably clean hulls, whereas the RN standard figures usually were quoted with the hull 6 months since cleaning in temperate waters. (The RN also noted the effect of...