Welcome to the forum!!!!!
Do you think that all this stuff can be acomodated on a battleship size deck?
Search found 1855 matches
- Thu May 08, 2008 12:23 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Nuclear powered Battleship?
- Replies: 187
- Views: 112467
- Sun May 04, 2008 10:55 pm
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: RMS Titanic´s anniversary
- Replies: 29
- Views: 12883
Re: RMS Titanic´s anniversary
The flow was not reversed because the centre screw was stopped, this screw was turbine powered with no reverse turbine built into it.I know the ship was still going ahead but the flow past the rudder may have been reversed.
- Fri May 02, 2008 1:10 am
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
Yes, I undestand that for the long range machine gun fire the increased wear was accepted. Anyway, a machine gun barrel doesn´t last too much.Maybe the increased wear is acceptable
- Thu May 01, 2008 5:07 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
Bgile: I found a ballistic table for 30-06 at this site http://www.snipercentral.com/3006.htm. It doesn´t give bullet velocities, but it gives KE at ranges down to 1000 yards. At that distance KE is 530 ft-lb. I made a calculation and that energy for a 168 gr bullet corresponds to a velocity of 1190...
- Thu May 01, 2008 4:30 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
I remember reading that another problem with boat tailed ammo is that the gases pushes between the boat tail and the bore, eroding it more quickly than flat based ammo.
- Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:54 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
I think that a 30-06 or 308 is already subsonic at that range but let me check. I also disagree that the boat tail is intended to easier loading: for that a less pronounced tail will do.
- Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:42 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
Yes they do at long range. The boat tailed bullets were originally used in machine guns for this purpose.
- Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:43 am
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
I believe the modern 5"/54 cal US naval gun has a boat tailed shell, as do hand loaded sniper rounds. Both are supersonic. Rifle bullets are boat tailed to reduce drag in the subsonic regime. The low maximum elevation of the rifle (compared to a gun) makes the final part of the trajectorie sub...
- Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:00 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
more aerodynamic windscreen to decrease nose drag, boat tail base to decreased base drag I want to add something to this. The "nose drag" is produced by the supersonic shock wave. There are two types of waves: oblique and transverse. The transverse shock wave forms a little ahead of blunt...
- Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:27 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
I am surmising as a layman, as I am not a professional artilleryman nor a physics graduate! Neither I am!!! I will explain it shortly for you Robert: Newton´s first law: Acceleration = Force / Mass The mass is the weight of the shell, which is the same as an ordinary charges. The force is the press...
- Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:01 pm
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Read about or do?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7168
Read about or do?
I notice that some of the members of the forum are former professional sailors, but most of us (including me of course, a sailboat amateur) are just interested in reading and learning about ships. Did you ever in your lifes think about becoming a professional sailor? If so, why did you put it down? ...
- Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:49 am
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: British 15-inch Supercharges
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8741
Re: British 15-inch Supercharges
Robert, if the supercharge wouldn´t increase velocity, how do you think it increases range?Would I be right in thinking that a supercharge could affect the velocity of a shell, particulary at shorter ranges, before atmospheric/wind resistance slows the shell.
- Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:48 am
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: Luftwaffe torpedo planes
- Replies: 49
- Views: 25506
Re: Luftwaffe´s torpedo planes
You give 0.5 ship sunk to each, like two pilots downing the same plane.how do you include a ship that is both bombed and torpedoed before it sinks?
- Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:42 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: Luftwaffe torpedo planes
- Replies: 49
- Views: 25506
Re: German torpedo bombers
The F4U Corsair must have had some of the same pilot visibility problems. I remember that they didn't initially work very well on carriers, even though they were designed originally with that in mind. I hadn't thought of this before, but it bears some resemblance to the FW190 D9. Odd, since the Cor...
- Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:38 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: Luftwaffe torpedo planes
- Replies: 49
- Views: 25506
Re: Luftwaffe´s torpedo planes
In WWII Germany sank some 4800 enemy ships by joint effort of all her forces. U-Boats (losses 620) sank about 2800+ enemy transports and some 300+ warships. Luftwaffe sank some 800 enemy transports and 400 warships of which the Condor alone sank about 250 enemy ships with few losses of their own. G...