Search found 84 matches
- Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:13 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Marschall instead of Lutjens
- Replies: 179
- Views: 40932
Re: Marschall instead of Lutjens
... Operation Berlin was not a great success in terms of actual results. The actual sinkings could have been achieved by a pair of hilfskreuzer. Even the assault on one merchant ship, the Chilean Reefer, almost went pear-shaped. Yes, there was substantial dislocation of convoy cycles and deplyment ...
- Thu Aug 07, 2008 10:49 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Marschall instead of Lutjens
- Replies: 179
- Views: 40932
Re: Marschall instead of Lutjens
... For Germany a surface fleet is a luxury. It isn't needed for the defence of Germany itself, that is the role of the German Army. Therefore a German surface fleet is entirely expendable, the Germans can afford to be aggressive and take risks, the British cannot. So an attack on an aircraft carri...
- Thu Aug 07, 2008 10:12 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Marschall instead of Lutjens
- Replies: 179
- Views: 40932
Re: Marschall instead of Lutjens
... This is a very odd statement it is clear that he knew he had unreliable ships with badly trained crews. He promptly blasted vast amounts of ammunition away One minute everybody is impressed by the (equal) longest ever naval hit proving highly efficient gunnery and the next the performance is ca...
- Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:29 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Marschall instead of Lutjens
- Replies: 179
- Views: 40932
Re: Marschall instead of Lutjens
A somewhat strange thread to me – ever since it startet … Hm – Marschall instead of Luetjens. Why? Admiral Marschall seems to get a halo attached to his head here because he sunk a heavy British unit by going straight in for the kill. So what? Admiral Luetjens did the same; more reluctantly but as e...
- Sat Jun 07, 2008 10:43 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck Rate of Fire and Antonio Reconstruction
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8751
Re: Bismarck Rate of Fire and Antonio Reconstruction
SMS Seydlitz came back home on hands and knees but she came back home. That episode must have impressed them very much. This is an important point. For combat in the North Sea in a scenario involving navies of somewhat comparable strength, the survivability of a ship was a worthy consideration. Sey...
- Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:24 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck Rate of Fire and Antonio Reconstruction
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8751
Re: Bismarck Rate of Fire and Antonio Reconstruction
... The latest findings and conclusions, co-authored by James Cameron (the senior author), Bill Garzke, Bob Dulin, Ken Smith, myself and one other, will be released at a meeting of the American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE) on, I believe, 24 June. This paper represents several years of detailed...
- Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:01 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Who designed the Bismarck
- Replies: 34
- Views: 10565
Re: Who designed the Bismarck
History has not quite preserved what left me with the nickname 'ufo' but I carry it around since schooldays – it somehow just stuck. :think: The naming of 'NARA' is easier though: National Archives and Records Administration, USA. It's the States equivalent to our Public Records Office. NARA still h...
- Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:33 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Who designed the Bismarck
- Replies: 34
- Views: 10565
Re: Who designed the Bismarck
As an aside I was wondering if Heye's thesis was ever published, this is the first instance I've been made aware of it. Do you read German? Than at least you can get half way to read Helmuth Heyes thoughts on the topic. Michael Salewski published some key German thesis in the third volume of his &q...
- Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:25 am
- Forum: Naval Propulsion
- Topic: Three shafts versus four
- Replies: 25
- Views: 26292
Thank you ! Things to think about in there! And I wasn’t aware that the ‘Nanny’ was also twin shafted. Two propeller tankers are awesome monsters! The Swedes say on their page that: “… and low propeller induced vibrations compared with those of a corresponding single screw ship.” Is that more or les...
- Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:40 pm
- Forum: Naval Propulsion
- Topic: Three shafts versus four
- Replies: 25
- Views: 26292
Three shafts versus four
... Stuart Slade has a few excellent hydro-articles at warships1.com. In on article he comments that Hipper’s ship without the center shaft only gains 1 knot. Slade concludes the center shaft is not very efficient. Although I really like his articles, this conclusion I strongly do not agree with. T...
- Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:11 pm
- Forum: Naval Technology
- Topic: Big mast´s clock
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5322
An all time classic that question :D Bob Henneman has a fine article on that topic on his pages: http://www.bobhenneman.info/Rangeclocks.htm As addons to the article: - Battleships of the Imperial Highseas Fleet used them as well. I think there is a picture of SMS Kaiser often seen in the net with a...
- Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:25 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Bismarck and Prinz Eugen are joined by Tirpitz
- Replies: 62
- Views: 24309
... But I still think that an uninhistorical Tirpitz with a historical Bismarck would be a a menace to the brits bigger than the arithmetical sum of the parts. :stubborn: Very best regards! I am sure you are very right that Bismarck plus Tirpitz would have had much :!: more an impact than the bare ...
- Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:41 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: HMS Prince of Wales received hits on DS
- Replies: 22
- Views: 10357
... Correct me if I am wrong here but just looking at the Hoods armor particulars, I assume a 15 inch shell from the Bismarck would have to pass through either the Hood's 12 inch main belt or her 7 inch upper belt + 2 inches of deck armor + 12 inches of barbette armor to reach her main magazine. Is...
- Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:21 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: V. Adm L. Holland conduct in Capo Teulada battle
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2083
Hm – I do think Admiral Holland had much justification for his conduct of Battle. As for his approach: It worked! He had already bridged the gap of vulnerability to plunging shellfire from Bismarck. His ship did not fall victim a one of the feared and dreaded deck hits but was probably simply hit th...
- Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:07 am
- Forum: Naval History (1922-1945)
- Topic: Very Long Range Shoots
- Replies: 20
- Views: 12877
Hej marty1 If you look at sheer range you probably get better with costal batteries. The German H-Class 16” battleship guns in shore use could achieve ranges of up to 56.ooo m. I think in Norway there were some emplacements; 'Batterie Dietl', Vestfjord, I think and 'Batterie Trondness' in Vaagsfjord...