Search found 919 matches
- Fri Nov 17, 2023 12:20 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: BISMARCK armor scheme = BADEN?
- Replies: 160
- Views: 35859
Re: BISMARCK armor scheme = BADEN?
shared similar armor schemes. .... your description appears to short somthing more comprehensive: Excerpt from "Unterlagen zur Bestimmung der Hauptkampfentfernung..." Based on the experience of Worldwar I and as a result of the development of weapons, armor protection has been improved pr...
- Wed Nov 15, 2023 12:02 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: KM 15.9 CM guns
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8902
Re: KM 15.9 CM guns
Armament Kreuzer Typ P Screenshot 2023-11-15 115900.png as the 28 cm turrets were not available the Kreuzer Typ P was transferred into Schlachtschiff Typ "O" May - July 1939 secondaries remain of the same type. in Addition ther is no 15,9 cm Gun in the Admirality manual for guns Screenshot...
- Sun Nov 05, 2023 11:58 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
MWa considers a dependence between (Seelenlänge)and relative muzzleenenergy and accuracy of a gun.
- Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:53 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
Its my opinion that Yamatos guns could overmatch the sideprotection of Littorio.
The thickness of the decapping plate could be insufficent against this shell.
Remember the german indication was approx 20% of caliber thickness.
I think we have a borderline case.
The thickness of the decapping plate could be insufficent against this shell.
Remember the german indication was approx 20% of caliber thickness.
I think we have a borderline case.
- Thu Oct 26, 2023 6:34 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
with regard to german radar for italian ships. The Germans as far as the available documents provide, never intended to give Feinpeilung and Messkette to the Italians;-->only the basic device. the german specialist wich visited the italian ships for preparation of installation of german Funkmess con...
- Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:43 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Yamato 46cm overmatches Tirpitz side protection?
As to the overmatch: At 10km vs. Yamato’s projectiles had a 6° angle of fall. At 5° Tirpitz side protection, the 320mm belt + 120mm scarp @ 68° from vertical + 45mm torpedo bulkhead, gave a LOS thickness of 631mm acc. Thorsten Wahl. A spaced array type protection is strongly dependend on adjustment...
- Fri Oct 20, 2023 11:09 am
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Tirpitz vs. Yamato daytime March 1942
Im not sure if protection of Tirpitz may be overmatched by the sheer size of Yamatos projectiles.
if they do then Tipitz is in grave danger
if they do then Tipitz is in grave danger
- Thu Oct 19, 2023 5:24 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
what means DZ?
- Thu Oct 19, 2023 5:17 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
Underwater travel of armour piercing shell was also subject of german ballistic research already before the First World War. they found abnormalities in the hitdistrubution on the target depending on angle of waterentry. German WW1 shells typically skipped from the water surface at angles below 15 d...
- Thu Oct 19, 2023 12:33 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
another comment no ship would attack at all costs. in a battle against other ships every ship may have a comfortable zone, with regard to own weapons effect and own capability to withstand damage. the own capability to deal damage strongly depends on firecontrol facilities. Maybe ships with more ind...
- Thu Oct 19, 2023 7:14 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Gun precision / dispersion
- Replies: 129
- Views: 80383
Re: Gun precision / dispersion
Most excellent! Thank you Thorsten! So the 28.7 km tracking range on Scharnhorst were done using the new TS6 diodes. But because of a wrong cooling installation the performance of the new sender was downgraded to the performance of the old sender (with TS1?). makes sense. i will compile the Funkmes...
- Wed Oct 18, 2023 6:39 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Gun precision / dispersion
- Replies: 129
- Views: 80383
- Tue Oct 17, 2023 5:02 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Gun precision / dispersion
- Replies: 129
- Views: 80383
Re: Gun precision / dispersion
March 7th 1941 .
- Tue Oct 17, 2023 3:11 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
https://www.kbismarck.org/forum/download/file.php?id=464 Usually the distance was measured by several optical rangfinders. From these measurings a averaged value was taken for calculation of the firing solution. Seetakts were almost invariably nearer to this average value as each single measurement...
- Sat Oct 14, 2023 5:54 pm
- Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
- Topic: Fast Battleship League Table
- Replies: 169
- Views: 87545
Re: Fast Battleship League Table
With regard to performance of US shells versus horizontal armour plate. USN fire effect tables were based on Thompson F-formula.
BUT,
Thompson F-formula overestimates projectile performance at high oblique impacts by a fairly high margin, typically by about 10-15%.
BUT,
Thompson F-formula overestimates projectile performance at high oblique impacts by a fairly high margin, typically by about 10-15%.