Search found 1585 matches

by Herr Nilsson
Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:58 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: Bismarck construction flaws
Replies: 397
Views: 291323

Re: Bismarck construction flaws

Could the stabilized platform contact the ship structure at all?
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:42 pm
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships
Replies: 249
Views: 40222

Re: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships

No, there was just a 1 m stringer of 20 mm. The deck was 6 mm.
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:57 pm
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships
Replies: 249
Views: 40222

Re: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships

Only over the main armament magazines the armor deck was 100 mm in that compartment.
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:55 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: Bismarck's forward tanks
Replies: 2
Views: 1186

Bismarck's forward tanks

In the construction flaw thread is mentioned that Bismarck did not have the capability of remote pumping of the forward compartments containing fuel and there was a lack of pumps and valves for fuel protection. In the 2.000 tons water thread Bill wrote: The pump-room on Bismarck, was, incidentally, ...
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:10 pm
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships
Replies: 249
Views: 40222

Re: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships

If you're saying the upper deck was 50 mm over the magazines, everything is fine
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:07 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships
Replies: 249
Views: 40222

Re: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships

The quote you brought for the upper deck armour contradicts the original building plan. 50mm is what is in the original document says, 80mm is what some website claims without giving a source. You decide. You show a typical lack of respect for primary German documents and the people who worked mont...
by Herr Nilsson
Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:37 pm
Forum: Off Topic
Topic: Obama´s mosque
Replies: 193
Views: 55363

Re: Obama´s mosque

First. The main problem is NOT in their own countries: this mob can live their desert and flea infected lands. The ones in the West are the main problem, as the danish and french experiences are so much telling us. As the danes are doing obstacles for their inmigration have to be implemented. Then ...
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:39 pm
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: 2,000 tons of seawater in Bismarck's forecastle!
Replies: 52
Views: 16737

Re: 2,000 tons of seawater in Bismarck's forecastle!

Hi Olaf, there were reserve fuel bunkers in compartement XX-XXII. It was standard procedure to consume this fuel first. I agree that the trim would have been very negative regarding speed. That's why I'm asking. I see absolutely no reason to store fuel in that compartements, if it's avoidable. It ma...
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:55 pm
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: 2,000 tons of seawater in Bismarck's forecastle!
Replies: 52
Views: 16737

Re: 2,000 tons of seawater in Bismarck's forecastle!

It's an old thread, but this hit is still a mystery to me. Is there any reasonable cause to store fuel oil in compartements XX-XXII on May 24th at all?
by Herr Nilsson
Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:01 am
Forum: Bismarck Crewmember Research
Topic: Richter on the Bismarck
Replies: 10
Views: 16299

Re: Richter on the Bismarck

Krueger (Krüger) is usually listed as Joachim Krüger. I usually dissolve the Germanic umlaut "ü" into "ue" because it's readable on every computer system.
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Aug 25, 2010 7:37 pm
Forum: Bismarck Crewmember Research
Topic: Richter on the Bismarck
Replies: 10
Views: 16299

Re: Richter on the Bismarck

Dr. Otto Richter was on board Bismarck from August 22th 1940 to March 10th 1941 as "2. Arzt" (second physician) and was replaced by Dr. Hans-Joachim Krueger, who joined the crew on March 3rd 1941. Dr. Richter survived the war.
by Herr Nilsson
Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:54 pm
Forum: Bismarck Crewmember Research
Topic: Richter on the Bismarck
Replies: 10
Views: 16299

Re: Richter on the Bismarck

There was a Marinestabsarzt Dr. Otto Richter. He was transfered before Rheinuebung.
by Herr Nilsson
Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:01 pm
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: Oil Burners fitted on Bismarck
Replies: 11
Views: 3094

Re: Oil Burners fitted on Bismarck

boxy113 wrote:These were rotary cup atomiser type burners with a primary air fan integral to the atomiser and driven by an electric motor mounted on top of the atomiser.
AFAIK the burner was not electric but air driven.
by Herr Nilsson
Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:30 am
Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
Topic: Bismarck against BB-57 South Dakota
Replies: 706
Views: 81414

Re: Bismarck against BB-57 South Dakota

Yes, he was and he is one of them, who could really had this information.

If possible, I try to verify the validity of survivor statements. Trust is good, control better.
by Herr Nilsson
Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:04 pm
Forum: Hypothetical Naval Scenarios
Topic: Bismarck against BB-57 South Dakota
Replies: 706
Views: 81414

Re: Bismarck against BB-57 South Dakota

Hello Karl, I have no problem with that source. It refers to Statz, who was one of them... Thorsten Wall and David Saxton have adressed this issue before. The hits are improbable. You can search the forum for this; you'll find several conflincting eye-witness reports about those hits. Maybe, but I ...