Search found 1528 matches
- Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:10 pm
- Forum: Naval Weapons
- Topic: How to maintain effective fire
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5392
In German fire control of WW2, course and speed were provided to the fire control system automatically by master gyro compass and pitot log. As long as the course changes by own ship did not exceed run time of the analog computers and training speeds of the directors, rangefinders, and mounts, conti...
- Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:57 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: German loss of initiative
- Replies: 58
- Views: 21696
Terje: I think the best term would be the preceived radar superiority . It seems at this point that Luetjens was possibly giving Suffolk's radar greater capability than it actually had. At this stage of the war the new set on Suffolk was only marginally superior to the sets on Bismarck in terms of a...
- Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:37 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Denmarck Straits: Hood´s gunnery fault?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 8891
Hood's guns were adequately strong and in fact could have taken supercharges if need be. These heavier than the normal service charges and were supplied to such 15in gunned ships which had only 20* elevation and increased the muzzle velocity so as to allow them to shoot to over 30 000 yards. Hood's ...
- Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:21 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Denmarck Straits: Hood´s gunnery fault?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 8891
There were times during the battle when Bismarck and Prinz Eugen were fairly close together due to manouvering and the shell fragments which came aboard were probably from a shell or shells which landed in between the two ships. Just such an occurance can be seen in the famous film clip of the actio...
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:45 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck, The Target.
- Replies: 26
- Views: 8984
I believe the radio message you have cited, had to do with intercepting Scharnhorst and Gneisenau during the final stage of Operation Berlin, as the date of the message is 18/3. On 7/3 Malaya had sighted the two battle cruisers off the coast of Africa. Luetjens' ships sank a steamer two days later f...
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:16 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: German loss of initiative
- Replies: 58
- Views: 21696
There were actually three manouvers at different times. The first was an aborted doubling back in order to detach Prinz Eugen; second was the successful detachment during which Bismarck briefly engaged Prince of Wales to distract the British; the third, some hours later, was the successful manouver ...
- Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:02 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck, The Target.
- Replies: 26
- Views: 8984
- Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:55 am
- Forum: Naval Technology
- Topic: Effective battle ranges
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9072
Hi Begile, Well I am not quite saying the US handicapped themselves. Perhaps to a slight degree with the 16-in 50s they did, but the lower velocity 16-in 45s of the two preceeding classes would definitely have benifited from the steeper trajectories, at least as far as deck penetration went. While o...
- Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:53 pm
- Forum: Naval Technology
- Topic: Effective battle ranges
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9072
Dave and Karl have some interesting points and I agree. Discussions of range often overlook the ranges at which hits can be predictably achieved, and these are always much shorter than a gun's maximum range. Major factors determining maximum range of a gun (not to be confused with the maximum range ...
- Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:48 pm
- Forum: Naval Technology
- Topic: Balance: offensive vs. defensive?
- Replies: 55
- Views: 22228
They instead in 1939 ordered the conversion of light merchant ships for the job, and this is where my postulation has arisen. The ships used for the most part were not suitable, too old, too slow, fuel inefficient etc. Might I ask where you got the information that the merchant ships chosen were to...
- Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:32 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck in Bergen
- Replies: 19
- Views: 8264
I tend to agree that there has been some unjust criticism based on hindsight regarding Luetjens' apparent lack of concern regarding fuel. One must remember that the layover in Bergen was not a planned stage of the operation. The operational orders were to head straight from the Baltic to the Arctic ...
- Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:33 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck in Bergen
- Replies: 19
- Views: 8264
Lutjens did in fact believe the sortie had been compromised by the encounter with the Gotland and he did not want to run the risk of being caught at sea on the run north towards the arctic by coastal command bombers in daylight. Had he thought otherwise he might have made straight for the Arctic wit...
- Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:25 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck in Bergen
- Replies: 19
- Views: 8264
Refueling in Norway was not in the orders, neither was the stop over. In the first instance Lutjens made use of the time to refuel PE which had the shortest range of the two ships. However, there was only one tanker available for that and after topping off Prinz Eugen it would have taken some time t...
- Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:19 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Bismarck in Bergen
- Replies: 19
- Views: 8264