Search found 1458 matches
- Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:07 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: water line
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1009
Re: water line
José, each number of the draught marks is 10 cm high. The 4 represents 40-50 cm. The 6 represents 60-70 cm. The empty space between 4 and 6 represents 50-60 cm. The top edge of the waterline is very close to the top edge of the 4. That means it‘s about 52 cm. This would approximately correlate to th...
- Sat Oct 17, 2020 8:52 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: water line
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1009
Re: water line
Hello and welcome to the forums! The waterline is located between 8.0 and 10.45 meters from the keel. Color RAL 7016. Eh? What’s the source of these figures? The lower bound is officially 8.5 meters (but that is debatable, IMHO it‘s the lower edge of the belt armor) and the upper bound is 10.52 met...
- Wed Aug 12, 2020 11:19 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Was the battleship Bismarck really the best of its time?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 2387
Re: Was the battleship Bismarck really the best of its time?
Nevertheless the effect of Bismarcks AA-fire remain a mysterium. Other german ships with basically the same AA- and firecontrol suite performed significantly better in terms of aircraft downed - Scharnhorst and Prinz Eugen comes to mind. Nevertheless almost all swordfish received damage from Bismar...
- Mon Jul 20, 2020 8:22 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Robert J. Winklareth +
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1037
Re: Robert J. Winklareth +
R.I.P.
- Tue Jul 14, 2020 10:58 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Secundary guns turrets
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1447
Re: Secundary guns turrets
The new Bismarck´s book mentions that a secondary turret´s crew became locked in their post because the turret scuttle was deformed and could not be opened. Why couldn´t they escape from below deck? Well....this anecdote is based on Herbert Blum's account. Following his recollection of his way out ...
- Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:35 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Main armament hoists
- Replies: 7
- Views: 628
Re: Main armament hoists
....but not for power. I‘m not happy with my sentence. Of course there are a lot of electricity backups. I meant to say once all hoists are out of order for whatever reasons, there was no manual transport planed up to the guns. The 20.3 cm turrets of Prinz Eugen still had a so called „Hilfsheißvorr...
- Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:10 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Secundary guns turrets
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1447
Re: Secundary guns turrets
Thanks!
Brower is just more detailed. My plan shows the way of the ammuniton from piles on deck into the magazines and from there to each weapons. It shows just doors used for ammunition transport purposes.
Brower is just more detailed. My plan shows the way of the ammuniton from piles on deck into the magazines and from there to each weapons. It shows just doors used for ammunition transport purposes.
- Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:19 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Main armament hoists
- Replies: 7
- Views: 628
Re: Main armament hoists
No. There was a lot of manual backup for automation, but not for power.
- Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:51 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Secundary guns turrets
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1447
Re: Secundary guns turrets
What page?
- Sun Jun 28, 2020 1:31 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Secundary guns turrets
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1447
Re: Secundary guns turrets
Yes. The ammunition had to be transported on tweendeck via slides through the splinter bulkhead.
- Sun Jun 28, 2020 1:08 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Main armament hoists
- Replies: 7
- Views: 628
Re: Main armament hoists
One main and one auxiliary hoist per barrel. Main: (electro)hydraulic, auxiliary: electric. Auxiliary was backup of main. Main: just one cycle (projectile and propellant at once), auxiliary: two cycles (one after the other).
- Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:57 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: Mr. Virtuani's Opinion
- Replies: 4
- Views: 937
Re: Mr. Virtuani's Opinion
Alberto,
stay healthy and safe. Take care.
Best wishes from Germany to Italy.
Marc
stay healthy and safe. Take care.
Best wishes from Germany to Italy.
Marc
- Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:13 pm
- Forum: Naval History in General
- Topic: Prinz Eugen's hull
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4002
Re: Prinz Eugen's hull
AFAIK bilge keels were added and cool water intakes were modified (bigger?).
- Tue Feb 11, 2020 10:26 am
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
- Replies: 343
- Views: 18406
Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
... H (actual height of Bismarck main mast over water = c 45 meters) ... The height of the main mast was ~ 46,5 meters above the top of the bootstripe. Looking at pictures from the Grimstadfjord I think ~ 47 m or even more seems to be more plausible. Herr Nilsson has given an alternative frame form...
- Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:03 pm
- Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
- Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
- Replies: 343
- Views: 18406
Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
to Mr. Nilsson: are you aware what was standard PK photo camera used in 1941 and which focal was it mounting? Is there any documentation? Not necessarily just a Leica. The Kine Exakta was also very popular for Kriegsmarine purposes. Technically -- i.e. without quibbling about the third decimal plac...