Search found 3621 matches

by Alberto Virtuani
Wed Jan 01, 2020 8:37 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Happy New Year to everybody! 2020.jpg Byron Angel wrote: "The most recent post from Mr Virtuani on this thread promises a continuation of the same environment he has pursued over previous years" Wrong :negative: The last Mr.Jurens's post (http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=8756&start...
by Alberto Virtuani
Tue Dec 31, 2019 7:43 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Bill Jurens wrote: "Please do not attribute an endorsement which I did not make...you will note that my depiction is significantly different than Mr. Bonomi's. This area, of course, represents the area of major contention..." Your battlemap (pag.211, signed W.Jurens) is almost ident...
by Alberto Virtuani
Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:51 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Northcape wrote: ""super-detailed" and "accuracy" are two fundamentally different things, where one does not automatically imply the other" Correct observation. However, Antonio's 2005 map was detailed and accurate enough to be "adopted" by everyone up to 2019 (http://www.kbismarck....
by Alberto Virtuani
Sat Dec 28, 2019 5:17 pm
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Wadinga wrote: "...merely not to be the "looser" in an argument...." I bow in front of such a recognized expertise in defeats (http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6728&start=2250#p84821)... &: "...Mr Bonomi admitted: "YES, I agree about the perpendicular angle of the ...
by Alberto Virtuani
Wed Dec 25, 2019 9:32 am
Forum: Off Topic
Topic: Us as others see us
Replies: 2
Views: 1304

Re: Us as others see us

Of course RN hooligans are present in any board in the world and they don't like the TRUTH ... The true story of the DS battle has been presented here only, on the KBismarck forum, and not on BB vs BB board (where no original document nor any historical reconstruction has ever been discussed). Look ...
by Alberto Virtuani
Wed Dec 25, 2019 9:20 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: Season's Greetings!
Replies: 5
Views: 834

Re: Season's Greetings!

Hello everybody,

I do agree with M.Dunmunro and despite any contention among us, I wish everyone

Merry Christmas!

Bye, Alberto
by Alberto Virtuani
Wed Dec 25, 2019 9:15 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Wadinga wrote: "This thread is about German photographs and where they indicate German ships were, relative to one another" ..therefore, ask to someone, who felt necessary to express a totally unjustified "wonder" for the PG scarce documentation (http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewt...
by Alberto Virtuani
Tue Dec 24, 2019 9:13 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Bill Jurens wrote: "Norfolk and Suffolk were so peripherally involved -- one might fairly say that they did not participate in the main engagement at all..." Correct: they didn't participate to the main battle, despite being both able to do so... I would not say they were "periphera...
by Alberto Virtuani
Sun Dec 22, 2019 7:28 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Byron Angel wrote: "Is this meant to imply that some degree of uncertainty still endures after more than a decade of study, analysis and investigation? " of course, yes. Antonio's 2005 reconstruction was the best possible (later adopted by everybody...http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/...
by Alberto Virtuani
Sat Dec 21, 2019 8:44 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, " back in 2006 Mr Bonomi wrote " to Wadinga: "YES, I agree about the perpendicular angle of the camera lens to the railing itself . " while Mr.Wadinga insists to post only the over-simplification conclusion to Winklareth (http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=552&hilit=...
by Alberto Virtuani
Fri Dec 20, 2019 8:16 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Bill Jurens wrote: "Participants are reminded that 'emojis' -- which in technical conversation add little or nothing to content -- are to be avoided." Emojis are a standard feature of the forum, like bold, underline, fonts, etc... If you don't like, please, ask Mr.Rico to remove the...
by Alberto Virtuani
Thu Dec 19, 2019 8:26 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Wadinga wrote: "My mistake, upper deck not main deck" Therefore, no necessarily parallel railings to ship centerline and no 90°BS to PG course because: Antonio Bonomi cautioned Mr.Wadinga: "YES, I agree about the perpendicular angle of the camera lens to the railing itself . " Defin...
by Alberto Virtuani
Wed Dec 18, 2019 9:03 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Herr Nilsson wrote: "It's very safe to say NH 69730 is from the Denmark Strait Battle " Agree. Enough with "Indeterminateness excuses"... :clap: &: "For a true bearing one have to know the course, which is unknown. Therefore I have to use relative bearings, which was about 260° (I t...
by Alberto Virtuani
Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:03 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, Bill Jurens wrote: "I am happy to see that the "new rules"... seem to be helping somewhat... If I can do it, you can, too… -." Disagree. They just allow "majority" here to support each other, "silencing" my answers... Not answering questions (http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic...
by Alberto Virtuani
Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:56 am
Forum: Bismarck General Discussion
Topic: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?
Replies: 343
Views: 16934

Re: A correct attribution for the "Flash Effect" photo?

Hello everybody, as Mr.Nilsson posted twice, I assume I can do the same. However, for the future, I invite everybody to respect the restrictive "moderator" 's rules (http://www.kbismarck.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=8756&start=45#p85212), to post once per day only, or to explicitely challenge them ...